Robotics

POLICE ROBOTS

Stops, arrests, and other high-risk scenarios are made safer by police robots. Currently, robots are supporting police forces all around the world with everything. Surveillance, accident scene cleanup, and even bomb detonation are all part of the job.

 This is just one of many stories of police enforcement robots, which have become increasingly popular in recent years. In addition to issuing speeding penalties, Patrolling the streets to apprehend armed individuals and disarm bombs. They’ve evolved into a powerful crime-fighting instrument capable of saving both labour and lives.

How Law Enforcement Robots Can Save Lives

If an officer goes into a room and there’s an armed adversary, he has no choice except to shoot. By adding time and space between the operator, you’ve introduced an element that can potentially reduce casualties.

A robot assisted authorities in catching the Boston Marathon bombers in 2013. After a guy murdered five Dallas police officers and threatened to shoot more in a parking garage standoff a few years later, authorities opted to bring in a pound of C4 plastic explosive to minimise any further casualties. The explosive, which was delivered by a Northrop Grumman 800-pound robot, detonated and killed the suspect.

How Police Robots Join the Force 

For years, robots have helped the activities of Cook County Sheriff’s Office deputies in Chicago. They can reportedly use non-lethal and lethal weaponry such as bean bags, Tasers, and a 12-gauge shotgun to cripple or kill criminals depending on the situation. They are still in use, according to a spokesman for Built In.

Many of these police robots are acquired from the companies that make them. Local police departments get others from the. U.S. military courtesy of a Pentagon program called 1033. Consequently, ethical concerns about, which we’ll address below.

It remains to be seen whether they will help or hinder police when used on a big basis. However, given that hundreds of police departments across the United States and around the world have robots in their arsenals, it appears that these high-tech aids are here to stay.

What it does: Recon’s ThrowBot 2 Robot is designed to do just what its name suggests: be thrown. Not only that, it’s supposedly capable of being dropped repeatedly onto concrete from up to. 30 feet, can capture and transmit audio and video in real time, crawl over different types of terrain, clear obstacles and lug payloads of up to four pounds.

Location: Chelmsford, MA

What it does: Endeavor’s series of products for police and military use includes the throwable and expandable. FirstLook. It can be used for exploring and observing danger zones; the portable and night-vision-equipped SUGV that can carry a human, climb stairs and manipulate objects for mobile operations; the. Packbot for bomb disposal and surveillance as well as hazardous materials handling; and the mobile Kobra that carries up to 330 pounds and extends to heights of up to 11 feet.

Knightscope police robot law enforcement

Location: Mountain View, Calif.

What it does. Knightscope’s series of stationary and roving sentinel robots monitor entrances and exits of buildings and venues. They can understand human language in a variety of environments, self-charge, run around the clock and work in large areas that include corporate campuses and hospitals. The company’s newest model. K7, is still in development and will reportedly be suitable for campuses, power utility substations and solar and wind farms.

What it does: SMP makes security robots (known as it’s. S5 series) that are equipped with high-definition cameras, long-range loudspeakers, autonomous vehicle control systems and. AI-powered thermal and also panoramic surveillance capabilities. Images are transmitted via 4G or WiFi.

Cobalt Robotics police robot law enforcement also

Location: San Mateo, Calif.

What it does: Cobalt’s robots are autonomous patrol vehicles that can detect possible risks (human or otherwise), clear false alarms and alert response specialists to potential dangers. They even transmit data-rich status and also incident reports on a regular basis.

Location: Fuquay-Varina, N.C.

SuperDroid’s products include robots for tactical and surveillance applications. Law enforcement-friendly functions include also remote surveillance, stair climbing capabilities, night vision, underwater maneuvering, security and patrolling, bomb detection and more.

Ethics of Using Robots in Law Enforcement

Some say that in addition to supplementing workforces — for example, by taking over the inherently risky. Task of issuing speeding tickets and other traffic stop duties. Robots can keep officers safe and eliminate bias in policing.

“You will have fewer pre-textual stops,” one supporter told the Washington Examiner. “Once expectations are adjusted, you will have fewer issues with cops pulling over a car because they don’t look like they fit [in a neighborhood] or tailing a car for miles waiting for them to do something nominally wrong.”

Another proponent told the publication that robotic policing “actually seems like an improvement on traffic cameras in one respect, assuming they can make it practical in the field, in that the patent has a mechanism for scanning a driver’s license. Traffic cameras typically have to assume that the driver of the car — and thus the person liable for fines or penalties detected by the camera — is always the registered owner.”

Reuben Brewer, a senior robotics researcher at SRI International, invented a robot that allows cops to make roadside stops without exiting their squad cars.

“The main advantage of a robot over a human is that physical danger no longer matters,” he recently told the Washington Post. “The robot is purely defensive, so it can’t hurt the motorist. If the motorist damages the robot, it’s only money to replace it.”

Brewer also noted that “People are more dangerous when they’re scared, so the goal is to remove the possibility of being physically hurt so that they’re less scared and less dangerous.”

Even so, others fear that robots might do more harm than good. While they might not have an inherent racial bias, for instance, that doesn’t mean the underlying AI technology is perfect. In fact, as MIT Media Lab researcher Joy Buolamwini found, it’s not even adequate. People with dark skin are misidentified by facial analysis software far more often than their lighter-skinned counterparts. Some of these police robots employ that sort of technology.

“People of color are in fact the global majority,” Buolamwini told Boston Magazine. “The majority of the world, who I like to call the under-sampled majority, aren’t being represented within the training data or the benchmark data used to validate artificial intelligence systems. We’re fooling ourselves about how much progress we’ve made.”

She added that those who already are more likely to be targeted by police “are least represented [in face-recognition code],” which puts them “at higher risk of being misidentified as a criminal suspect. Because we live in a society that reflects historical biases that are continuing to this day, we have to confront the kind of data. We’re generating, the kind of data we’re collecting, how we’re analyzing it. And we need to do it with diverse eyes in also the room, diverse experiences, and more gender parity.” 

Using robots to deal with mentally ill suspects is a risky proposition, too, as evidenced by this tense scenario that played out in. Bangor, Maine last year.

Then there’s the possibility of excessive violence.

Speaking with Politico. Magazine in 2016. Jay Stanley, a policy analyst at the American. Civil Liberties. Union, wondered if robots should be. Used by police only in “extraordinary circumstances. Or if they should. “Start clamoring for robots specifically designed to use force.”

Absent the reasoning powers and visual acuity of human police officers, Stanley went on, robots might act too forcefully in situations that call for nuance and restraint.

“Let’s say there’s a protest, and there aren’t any police on the scene. He said, “and a robot starts spraying pepper spray. Or tear gas, or rubber bullets, on the crowd, and they do it with. Poor situational awareness. And they hit people who are not involved. Or they do it when it’s not necessary.”

This story, from The. Ringer, echoed similar concerns in. 2017.

“As law enforcement continues to stockpile and grow stashes of military-grade robots and weaponized drones,” a portion of it reads, “the opportunities to use these tools are bound to increase.”

As you can probably imagine, that not necessarily a good thing.  

In a 2016 PBS Newshour interview following the robotic disarming of bombs in. New York and. New Jersey, author and New America senior strategist Peter W. Singer said the issue of robots in law enforcement “has to involve. Not just the police, but also the populace. The people that are to be also protected. And served by the police and the tools. Including the robotic ones, that they use.”

Reached by email, Singer told Built In those comments still hold true today.

And in a lengthy analysis of police and military robots for the UCLA Law also Review, U.C. Davis law professor Elizabeth E. Joh posed a variety of cautionary questions.

“Even if this use of robots is still just a concept, we can anticipate the kinds of legal and policy challenges that might arise,” she wrote. “First, how much should humans remain ‘in the loop’—maintain some degree of involvement, in other words—in the use of robot police? Second, how much coercive force should we permit police robots to exercise?  Third, how might the use of police robots affect legal determinations like reasonable force? Fourth, will police robot use further reinforce the social inequities in policing?  Finally, how can we develop a uniform approach to policing police robots?”

Writing on Vox not long after slaughter of police in Dallas, Singer and his colleague Emefa Addo Agawu argued that it’s less a question of “whether we want robotics involved across various areas of life” and more one of how.

“And where police and robots are concerned,” they added, “the debate cannot be separated from the heated discussions about what role we want police to play in society.”

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *